Lebanese and the Conflict in Syria

There should be a moratorium imposed on all Lebanese statements regarding Syria. Of course, some statements are more vulgar and more crude than others. Walid Jumblatt – as always – deserves the award for the most opportunistic shifts and transformations in a matter of months.

Here is Jumblatt, the friend, ally, and client of the Syrian regime over the decades now posing as the friend of the Syrian people (just as he posed as a friend of the Palestinian people before his close support for Israeli aggression on Lebanon in 2006 was exposed for all to see – before and after Wikileaks). Jumblatt went in one year from supporting Bashar Assad in his repression to posing as the champion of the Syrian people, and Jumblatt did that to attain Saudi forgiveness (on the day of receiving the Saudi ambassador in Lebanon, Jumblatt came up with the formula that injustice in Syria is “worse” than injustice in Palestine).

Lebanese are not qualified to comment on Syrian matters, and this applies to most people and most politicians. How could anyone take the Lebanese Forces seriously? And how can anyone take the various media outlets affiliated with them seriously (like MTV, LBC, or An-Nahar) when they pretend that they are strong supporters of Syrian protests and when they feign concern for the Syrian population?

Those same media have for years fanned the flames of racism and hatred against all Syrian people. Racism against the Syrian people – all Syrian people – have been a staple of Lebanese comedy. And how can Lebanese nationalist chauvinism be manifested except through condescension and contempt for others – notably Palestinians, Syrians, and all the foreign workers in Lebanon?

But the March 14 Movement (led by stooges of the Syrian regime for decades – with the exception of the Lebanese Forces and the Phalanges) went to extremes in demonizing the Syrian people and all things Syrian. They are responsible for the acts of murder and abuse against the Syrian workers in Lebanon which began in earnest following the assassination of Rafik Hariri. The movement openly and publicly mocked all things Syrian (the Hariri family’s daily mouthpiece, Al-Mustaqbal, specialized in the hate), and the poor Syrian street vendors were portrayed as agents of the Syrian mukhabarat, which triggered a campaign of stabbings and shootings against them.

Scores of Syrian workers have been killed in the last few years and about 700 Syrian workers have gone missing.

An American reporter in Beirut walked the streets to document the many cases of abuse against Syrian workers. The bruises on their faces told their stories but most of them were reluctant to talk to her. Neither the Syrian government nor the Lebanese government bothered to push for investigation. And the pro-Syrian March 8 coalition in Lebanon did not raise its voice in defense of the Syrian workers.

The plight of Syrian workers in Lebanon does not figure on any agenda in Lebanon or in Syria. And similarly, neither the Syrian government nor the Syrian National Council bother to bring up the issue of Syrian workers in Lebanon and their continued abuse. In fact, the Syrian National Council is now officially aligned with the coalition that sponsored and triggered attacks on Syrians in Lebanon.

It would be useful for the Lebanese people and their representatives – with the exceptions of those who championed the rights of Syrians in Lebanon – to butt out of the debate on Syria and treat themselves as intruders on the Syrian people. They have lost the right to participate on the discussion of Syrian affairs and they have no moral right to weigh in at all.

Comments

Asad Abukhalil,
I have emailed you before telling you that Annahar has been my main source of daily news for the past 7 years, and that I've never seen anything racist against the Syrian people in Annahar.
I dare you. I dare you Asad Abukhalil to provide one Annahar story that is racist to the Syrian people. Just one.
You keep asking about proof for the autrocities of the Assad regime, which you secretly admire. Bring us your proof of the 700 Syrian workers who went missing in Lebanon. And if you can't you owe the Lebanese people an apology for your lies. Yoy are a liar and a propagandist. You should be ashamed of yourself. You, not Lebanon, have Syrian blood on your hand. You also have the blood of Gibran Tueni whom you mocked on his anniversary on your dirty hands.You lying ugly creature.

If March 14 are hypocritical towards the Syrian situation, which they are, than so is March 8, especially Hezbollah, and since As'ad is so concerned about Syrian workers, I don't see his buddies in Hezbollah providing assistance to the thousands of Syrian refugees in Lebanon, and he rarely talks about the hypocrisy and actions of Hezbollah's allies against the Palestinians towards like the Syrian army, Amal, and Michel Aoun who used to collaborate with the Zionists in the 82 invasion.

As'ad needs to practice what he preaches and leave Syria alone. He has done (along with Al-khbar) nothing but harm to the plight of the Syrian people. Here he focuses on one camp and does not bring up the vile outrageous propaganda filled lebanese coverage of Syria in "Al-Akhbar, Al-Manar , NBN , O-TV" they have done more harm towards the Syrian people than the lame March 14th media. Al-Akhbar led by its editor Ibrahim al-amin has been the MEMRI of Syrian revolution. If AJA is bad , Al-Khbar is atrociously horrid.

Thus spake the man himself. (how pretentious a name)
(assuming you're the same dude that blogs with Tony) You used to quote As'ad Abukhalil like he was your god. When As'ad's objectivism didn't agree with you anymore, then you ask him to leave Syria alone. Do you ask Aljazeera to leave Syria alone or Saudi Arabia. At the very least, As'ad was always anti-regime, as his blog proves it, way before there was an Arab spring. And Ibrahim al Amin refuses to just tow the line and regurgitate western and gulf media rubbish and reports objectively. But you want him to ignore the other side because you don't like it. Don't blame them if the Syrian uprising is lead by sectarians and doesn't have the overwhelming numbers. If the supporters of the uprising are people like you who want to stifle opposition then I am not really crazy about them succeeding.

As a matter of fact, Al-Akhbar published a lot of articles with support for "rebels". No fault of the paper if the "rebels" sound mostly like sectarian puppets of NATO/GCC - they a their puppets, and now are OPENLY on payroll.

It is not a fault of As'ad either if AJ was caught fabricating "news" about Syria. Al-Akhbar was not. So, less lies from "rebels" and their backers would be less damaging to their case, if the case were not sectarian-imperialist one. No fault of Al-Akhbar either.

Anyway, whether anti-Syrian racists aka March 14th media are "lame" or not is not a point here, but their sudden love to Syrians is.

Given Zionists' sudden "love" for Syrian people it is a bit harsh of As'ad to deny Zionists' Lebanese "friends" the right to do the same :)

Hezbollah, had no problem when it's Iraqi Shi'ites allies were cavorting with the Zionist Neocons, nay the likes of Chalabi and Ja'fari are invited and feted in Beirut. Spare me your hypocrisy and to this day, Iran and Hezbollah's allies were the biggest winners of the American occupation in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Once again you forget to include an upper case "NOT".

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
^ Back to Top