UN Security Council passes resolution on Syrian chemical weapons

Al-Akhbar is currently going through a transitional phase whereby the English website is available for Archival purposes only. All new content will be published in Arabic on the main website (www.al-akhbar.com).

Al-Akhbar Management

Published Saturday, September 28, 2013

The UN Security Council unanimously passed a landmark resolution Friday ordering the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons and condemning a deadly poison gas attack in Damascus.

UN leader Ban Ki-moon, who called the resolution "the first hopeful news on Syria in a long time," said he hopes to convene a peace conference in mid-November.

The major powers overcame a prolonged deadlock to approve the first council resolution on the conflict, which is now 30 months old with more than 100,000 dead.

Resolution 2118, the result of bruising negotiations between the United States and Russia, gives international binding force to a plan drawn up by the two to eliminate President Bashar al-Assad's chemical arms.

The plan calls for Syria's estimated 1,000 tons of chemical weapons to be put under international control by mid-2014. Experts say the timetable is very tight.

International experts are expected to start work in Syria next week. Britain and China announced that they will offer finance to the disarmament operation.

Divisions over the war remained clear, however, in comments by their foreign ministers after the vote.

"Should the regime fail to act, there will be consequences," US Secretary of State John Kerry warned the 15-member council after the vote sealing a US-Russian agreement.

But Kerry hailed the resolution.

"The Security Council has shown that when we put aside politics for the common good, we are still capable of doing big things," he said.

There are no immediate sanctions over a chemical weapons attack, an event UN experts confirmed. But it allows for a new vote on possible measures if the Russia-US plan is breached.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stressed that there were no automatic punitive measures, and that the resolution applied equally to the Syrian opposition.

He said the council would take "actions which are commensurate with the violations, which will have to be proven 100 percent."

Russia, Assad's main ally, has rejected any suggestion of sanctions or military force against Assad. It has already used its veto power as a permanent Security Council member to block three Western-drafted resolutions on Syria.

The resolution "condemns in the strongest terms any use of chemical weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic, in particular the attack on 21 August 21,2013, in violation of international law."

The United States says the attack on the Damascus suburb of Ghouta left more than 1,400 dead. It blamed Assad's government for the sarin gas assault and threatened a military strike over the attack.

The government has denied any responsibility in the attack.

Should Syria not comply with the resolution, the Security Council members agreed to "impose measures under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter."

The charter can authorize the use of sanctions or military force. But diplomats said Russia would fiercely oppose any force against its ally. All sides agreed that new action will require a new vote.

Russia also rebuffed calls by European powers Britain and France for the Ghouta attack to be referred to the International Criminal Court.

The resolution expressed "strong conviction" that those responsible for chemical weapons attacks in Syria "should be held accountable."

It formally endorsed a decision taken hours earlier in The Hague by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) to accept the Russia-US disarmament plan.

Ban said the resolution "will ensure that the elimination of the Syrian chemical weapons program happens as soon as possible and with the utmost transparency and accountability."

The Security Council resolution gave backing to the 2012 conference declaration, which stated that there should be a transitional government in Syria with full executive powers.

It also determined that the new peace conference would be to decide how to implement the accord.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said after the adoption of the resolution that the international community must now step up efforts to help those caught up in a humanitarian crisis.

Ban also told the Security Council he wanted to hold a new Syria peace conference in November.

"We are aiming for a conference in mid-November," Ban said, adding that foreign ministers from Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States had agreed to make sure the two sides in the conflict negotiate in "good faith."

A first peace conference was held in June 2012 but there has been no follow up because of divisions in the Syrian opposition and the international community.

Ban will start contacts with his Syria peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi next week on setting the firm date and who will attend the new meeting, diplomats said.

"All violence must end. All the guns must fall silent," Ban said.

He also noted that the resolution was not "a license to kill" with conventional arms.

"A red light for one for one form of weapons does not mean a green light for others," Ban said.

"We must never forget that the catalog of horrors in Syria continues with bombs and tanks, grenades and guns.”

(AFP, Al-Akhbar)

Comments

Syria should never ever get rid of any of its weapons unless Russia vows to do much more than they have been doing.Russia could and should have stepped in from week one and stopped this American Israel created and funded terrorist proxie war that has been allowed to wage against Syria and its people for over 2 years.The fact that the entire world knows very well America and Israel are the creators and funders of the terrorist in Syria yet the world does little about it should disgust us all.The terrorist in Syria are CIA/mossad recruited terrorist and killers who have been recruited from all over the world and funneled to Syria through Turkey and jordan mainly.Syria should give up some of its main weapons so America and Israel can continue to fund,train,arm and import terrorist and killers to Syria?? That would be insane!!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

^ Back to Top