Georges Abdallah is Free

When Georges returns to his village, sheep will be slaughtered and the church bells will ring. (Photo: Marwan Tahtah)

By: Bassam Alkantar

Published Friday, January 11, 2013

Next Monday, 14 January 2013, at dawn at the latest, the gates of Lannemezan Prison in southwest France will be opened for the release of Georges Ibrahim Abdallah. It will mark day 10,309 of his imprisonment and he will finally be set free.

The sun of Kobayat, his hometown in North Lebanon, will be able to caress the face of the leader of the Lebanese Armed Revolutionary Factions (LARF), who was subjected to an unfair series of trials.

On Thursday, there were many reasons why Abdallah’s family was still concerned about his release, but the eyes of his eldest brother Joseph had a lot to say. The volatile revolutionary intellectual from Akkar had been looking for indicators about the French judiciary’s performance, ever since the court of conditional release accepted his brother’s eighth appeal – and decided to expel him from France – on 21 November 2012.

The most prominent sign was the speed with which the ruling judge agreed to set a date for the appeal of his latest decision. The appeal was made by the French justice ministry, which objected to Abdallah’s release under the flagrant directions of the US.

This was in addition to setting yesterday, 10 January 2013, as the date for announcing the final decision, four days prior to the date set by the courts for the foreign ministry to prepare for his expulsion from French territories.

Joseph, a sociology professor, called those who carried the banner of his brother’s release “brigands.” They are outcasts from their sects and parties who were the only ones to stand up to France while everyone else scrambled to attend the receptions at the French Ambassador’s residence on Bastille Day.

French authorities have always believed Georges’ brothers to be part of the “armed revolutionary groups in Lebanon.” They accused the Abdallah family of being behind the operation on Rennes street in Paris on 17 July 1986 when an Israeli diplomat and US military attaché were assassinated.

The accusation was a blatant lie, especially after the counter-terrorism investigations office at the Public Prosecution in Paris found that neither Abdallah nor his family members were implicated in the attack.

In his memoirs published in 2003, Avant de Tout Oublier, former counter-terrorism judge Alain Marsaud wrote: “Abdallah was originally indicted for something he did not do. After a short period, we got a hold of the evidence which put us on the right track and allowed us to identify those responsible for the 1986 attacks.”

“Blaming Fouad Saleh for the 1986 attacks led to an immediate lifting of pressure, and returned the situation of Georges Abdallah to its right position,” he wrote. “A few hours after the Rennes street attack, our investigations had led us to the Abdallah brothers and several witnesses who identified Abdallah’s brothers. But this confusion was immediately clarified: one of the bombers, called Habib Haidar, who was directly implicated in the Rennes street attack, had an uncanny resemblance to Emile Abdallah.”

On the heels of allegations that the Abdallah family was behind the attack and the announcement of a financial reward for information about their whereabouts, the family held a press conference in Kobayat.

According to Joseph, this put the French intelligence services in an awkward position. For the previous several hours, they had been promoting silly police tales about the family arriving in Paris, carrying out the operation, and then fleeing.

At the conference, the Abdallahs demanded that the financial reward be paid to the families of the victims of the attacks that Georges Abdallah was accused of being behind.

However, the family, which was involved in the resistance against the Israeli occupation of Lebanon, does not deny that they did kidnap two Frenchmen in the mid 1980s to exchange them for Georges. But Lebanese and Syrian pressure prompted them to release the hostages.

Today, the family has many concerns about the future. Georges Abdallah is under threat of being assassinated in his French cell. He also needs to be provided with protection in his home country, which is wide open to all the planet’s intelligence services.

The assassination threats are not merely a theory. When William Casey was head of the CIA, he went to France to pressure the French government through its then-security minister Robert Pandraud.

In the 1991 book Les Masques du Terrorisme, Patrice de Méritens and Charles Villeneuve described a meeting over lunch between Casey and Pandraud: “William threatens Robert with a fork. The message is clear: if Abdallah does not receive a life sentence, the US will consider that France did not respect the basic rule of justice and failed to honor its commitments thereof, which will lead to a diplomatic boycott.

“A few seconds later came the typical reply: I have something better to propose to you, Pandraud coldly explained. Abdallah gets released. Then we send him to the Middle East and provide you with all the information about him.

“You, the US, this great country with all its networks in the region, will not find it difficult to eliminate him. And the matter will be put to rest forever.”

When Georges returns to his village, sheep will be slaughtered and the church bells will ring. There, he will be able to decide calmly how he will spend his days, which are bound to begin frantically and slowly quiet down. But he will not be too excited about going back to his job as a public school teacher and striking for a salary raise.

This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.

Comments

I see you have discovered the dlpciuity and hypocrisy of the US recognition and non-recognition of resistance, congratulations. Contrary to popular belief this game is played all over the world, and always coincides with US interests. So it is driven not merely by the pressure of any given lobby (although that might be the case in some instances), in other cases it is just how it plays to whatever the goal in the region might be.Second, the US is not interested in non-violent resistance in the sense that it finds it commendable and morally sound, but in the sense that it has learned to live with the fact that resistance will always be there, and the best way to control it is to keep it from becoming radicalized and just maintaining its goals in the face of non-violent resistance. The cat almost got out of the bag with BillR's statement above, but I can see that it was either not recognized or glossed over. Third, the US nor Israel sees any threat in Palestinian non-violent resistance, except that it might be recognized by adherents to this methodology in other parts of the world and will give the Palestinians a human face. In fact Israel resists the non-violent activism too much, which makes me think that this is what it wants people to believe that it sees this as a threat just like it opposes BDS. However, historically under such oppression, there has always been a mixture of both violent (which is not exactly like the colonial violence of the Israeli state, but is a form of true self-defense) and non-violent activity that has always been historically successful. So take a lesson from the hypocrisy of the US, which has never liked non-violent resistance but would much rather have it than a mixture of non-violent and more radical activity, because non-violence by itself can be recuperated and easily controlled. Don't be surprised when eventually Israel begins to relate better to non-violent resistance, while nothing substantial changes just like in the USA.

Georges Abdallah is not free.
La france refuse de la libérer malgré que le juge le veuille.

Either you or I have got the details of the original case completely wrong. According to what I have found on the web over the last hour, Abdallah was charged with the murder of US assistant military attaché Charles Robert Ray, but not that of Israeli second secretary for political affairs Yaacov Bar-Simantov. Bar-Simantov’s killer, a woman wearing a white beret, fled into the Paris Metro after shooting him in the head in front of his wife and children at their apartment building. Abdallah supposedly shot Ray outside his apartment building the same year, which was 1982, not 1986, Abdallah was incarcerated in 1984, so he could hardly have been accused of anything that happened in 1986.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

^ Back to Top