Al-Akhbar and Syria: No Room for Silence

Al-Akhbar is currently going through a transitional phase whereby the English website is available for Archival purposes only. All new content will be published in Arabic on the main website (

Al-Akhbar Management

Syrian refugees carry food supplies donated by Turkish villagers across the border to fellow refugees still stuck in Syria, near the village of Guvecci, Turkey, on the Turkish Syrian border, Tuesday, 14 June 2011.(Photo: AP - Vadim Ghirda)

By: Jamal Ghosn

Published Thursday, June 21, 2012

Revolution, Uprising, Protest Movement, Crisis, Armed Insurgency, Civil War, and many other variations of titles have been used over the past 15 months to describe events in Syria. There have been many disagreements on Syria over this span of time, but there is no disagreement over the fact that Syria has been the central event on the global political scene.

With the increased noise, rational debate on Syria was drowned out by a screaming match between an increasingly divergent dichotomous chorus of pro's and anti's. The longer the violence dragged on, the lower the tolerance for different opinions became. But the problem is that opinion and conviction were based on false, flawed, or in the best case incomplete information.

For an event with so much media coverage, there was and still is a scarcity of information. Whether by design, out of convenience, or just due to professional laziness, news coverage out of Syria was closer to rumor mill than journalism.

Media organizations, including Al-Akhbar, failed to deliver proper journalistic coverage of Syria. Unreliable sources, inaccessibility of troubled areas and many other factors may be used to rationalize this shortcoming. While the debate regarding a clear editorial line was ongoing, the publication that prides itself on doing things differently found itself partner in a collective media failure in dealing with Syria.

Fifteen months into the events, Al-Akhbar’s editorial policy is that it stands for the basic rights of the Syrian people, for a united and free Syria, and against violence, hatred, destruction and civil unrest. The Syrians must have full sovereignty in deciding their political path without any foreign interference. All crimes should be investigated and all perpetrators, irrespective of their positions, should be held accountable by an independent judicial authority. This applies to all without exception.

However, the collective media failure has laid the groundwork for a situation that is dire in Syria, where only absolutes are tolerated – an absolute crushing of an uprising, or a complete destruction of a regime. Clarity is sought in the most murky of environments. But absolute answers do not exist. Just like there is no black and white in Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt, and other places, the political landscape in Syria is also painted with shades of gray.

Bashar al-Assad shouldn't go today. Bashar al-Assad should have never been president. After all, countries are not personal assets that are passed on as inheritance.

Theory is simple and beautiful and can even be principled – reality, not so much.

It is in this bloody reality, where the stakes are highest, that solutions journalism is most needed. This requires extra courage and effort to deal with the challenge of providing pro-active, alternative news coverage first. When talking about solutions, problems have to be identified. Both solutions and problems are in plural form. Reducing problems to a singular cause is nothing more than lazy evasion. This applies both to hailing someone as a savior or vilifying a person as the source of all ills.

When problems abound, ideas are needed. It is only in a free exchange of ideas that solutions can be found. Even wrong ideas can inspire the right ones. Modern communications technology and the new forms of media it brought with it have created a reality where opposing views are accessible on demand. Ignoring the fact that opposing views exist is self-deceit.

Yet when it comes to Syria, strong convictions and the deep divide lead many to both turn a blind eye to facts that may raise question marks about these convictions and dismiss opinions that disagree with them. A variation of Dante's deepest hell is often invoked to defend these positions. Censorship and oppression cut debates short, but also human egos and one-upmanship lead the way to dead-ends.

It is a time of crisis. While neutrality leads nowhere, the intolerance of the other and the refusal of debate has a very clear path – and it's not a pretty one.

Jamal Ghosn is Editor of Al-Akhbar English.


Catching up my reading this weekend, getting to earlier articles later -- the author's view and his admission that indeed we all do not know enough about what is going on, is exactly a correct assessment of the situation. And I agree al-Akhbar is doing much, much better than most media outlets in presenting whatever can be known from the chaos in Syria. Al-Akhbar English remains my number one recommendation for coverage of most of the Middle East. Keep up the good work.

So this is to be taken as a warning that Al-Akhbar is going to become just another Western-style propaganda outlet on the evils of the regime and the glories of the rebels. If we wanted to read that crap we would go to CNN. Your readers turn to you because they want another perspective beyond the US CIA psyops. If you don't understand that, then goodbye and good riddance. I will not return to your website.

Superb piece Jamal.

I hope you realize this balanced position makes you an unwitting supporter of imperialism, by Amal's lights. :)

If this is in response to what a certain priveleged white American had to say or not say about writing for Al-Akhbar English while REAL people are dying in Syria - then as a reader of Al-Akhbar English I say - who cares? The Syrian people are the issue, not meglomaniacs. No one cares who they write or don't write for - they aren't the story, no matter how hard they try to be. Good riddance.

Best article by an al-Akhbar journalist I've read thus far.

By allowing itself to be criticized on its own website, al-ahkbar is way ahead in the journalistic field.

Do you know what an ombudsman is? Most news outlets have them.

On the Syria issue, Al-Akhbar is still doing much better than any media outlet that I am familiar with.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

^ Back to Top