The end of electoral appeal in the Arab world

Al-Akhbar is currently going through a transitional phase whereby the English website is available for Archival purposes only. All new content will be published in Arabic on the main website (

Al-Akhbar Management

For too long, the totem of elections was sold to the people in the Middle East—those who live outside the pro-US tyrannical regimes in particular. In the decades of the Cold War, the whole premise of the US position was the belief in the moral and political superiority of the West vis-à-vis the Soviet Union due to the holding of regular and frequent elections. Yet, the American electoral system is probably one of the worst, corrupt model of democracies, not only due to the influence of big money ($4 billion in the last election cycle alone) but also due to the elitist Electoral College and the rigid rejection of proportional representation in order to preserve the two party dominance. The preservation of the first-past-the-post electoral system winds up wasting millions of votes, and renders all third parties insignificant and irrelevant.

Sadly, many in the Arab world bought into the belief of the election-is-the-solution (as opposed to Islam-is-the-solution). Even the Muslim Brotherhood became a champion of free elections. Various electoral models were discussed and the US believed – or pretended to – that once elections are held, there will be Arab-Israeli peace and that Arabs will not hold those atavistic grudges against the US anymore.
Yet, Western political hypocrisy was too visible to ignore. Western governments championed, armed, and defended tooth and nail the tyrannical polygamist dynasties of the Gulf and in the regimes of Jordan and Morocco. But the US was quite vigilant in pressing for free elections in countries where the governments are not clients of the US. The US pushed for elections in Iran, but not in Saudi Arabia, in Syria but not in Jordan, etc..

The elections in Algeria in 1991 made the intentions of the West clear. Western governments support free elections only if the results are consistent with Western political and economic interests. When the Algerian military junta cancelled the results of the elections, Western governments rushed to reward the anti-democratic rulers with weapons and financial assistance. And in 2006, after several years of redundant rhetoric by Bush officials about the desirability of free elections for the Palestinians (and the elections were not free as money from the US, UK, and Gulf regimes were pumped into the coffers of Fatah) the Bush administration lobbied the world to disregard the results of the elections, and even engineered (just as in 1953 in Iran) a coup by Mohammed Dahlan to take over power by force (Hamas was smarter, and preempted the coup).

The launch of the Arab uprisings reignited Arab popular faith in the power of free elections. Such elections followed in quick sequence in Tunisia and Egypt (the Libyan election was purely a contest between foreign dominating powers). The models of elections in those countries led people to reach clear conclusions about elections in the Middle East: 1) the US and its allies in the Gulf will not allow for any monitoring of outside financial support because those powers want to influence the results, as such the Tunisian presidential elections was really a contest between the US and Saudi Arabia against Turkey and Qatar. 2) The US and its allies will use the powers of Western lending institutions to tilt election results to the side that they favor. 3) There will be no respect for elections if the winners are seen as enemies or foes of the US and its allies. 4) The electoral systems will be designed with direct interference by the US and its allies to prevent an undesirable radical outcome. 5) The US has not overcome its complex from the Cold War: it will continue to fight to prevent a leftist ascendancy in any Arab country.

Fortunately, Arabs will no longer have illusions about elections. They now know that their voices will not be freely heard and their votes are filtered through a variety of layers intended to tilt the outcome of elections in certain directions. Israel, more than any other outside party, is afraid of free elections because it knows BDS, at least, will immediately follow and normalization will be fought. Yet, the US and Israel were able to control the agenda of al-Nahda (not to mention the party of the ancien regime of As-Sibsi) to prevent any harming of Israeli interests. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt learned the hard way the follies of trust in elections or in Western rhetoric.

Political contests will not be suspended in the Arab world but Western governments have forced them to play out in the streets, not in polling stations.

Dr. As’ad AbuKhalil is a Professor of Political Science at California State University, Stanislaus, a lecturer and the author of The Angry Arab News Service. He tweets @asadabukhalil


Arab Spring showed the younger generations something that older generations have known for a long time: the only road to peace and a government of the people is via the people demanding it AND that whenever the people collectively demand change, the powers that be will always fight back for status quo.

Whether those powers be western oligarchs or Islamic religious leaders is wholly irrelevant because they are one in the same as it applies to regular citizens just trying to live life.

Was the author using Arab Spring to call for more authoritarian, Islamist rule in the middle east or did i completely misinterpret the editorial?

The author hates democracy, hates the West, despises America, but lives in California in a taxpayer funded job. He trusts North Korea and loves China, but does not believe a word from the government of a country that allows him to write this. He defends regimes that would put him in jail for defending some of the very groups he idolizes.
Worse, the logic is flawed: would a democratic Arab world dedicate itself to BDS? Is that their first order of business? If so, how badly would that hurt Israel's economy, since it does more business with Greece than most Arab countries combined? Turkey is a democracy with a ruler who wants its Jewish residents drowned in the sea, but the amount of trade and tourism between the two countries is at an all time high and growing.
Natan Sharansky was the biggest advocate for Arab democracy and free markets because he underestimated the hate reservoir that built up in the region all these years. Author would call him naive and perhaps silly. Maybe he was, unfortunately.
PS- kind of curious about the eveidence you have about Israel controlling the Tunisian elections. Or American doing it, for that matter. That is quite a charge. Either Tunisians are idiots whose election has been stolen and they do not know it (nothing in English or French language local media that I saw about a rigged/stolen election) or Mossad is so stealthy that they did it without anyone but this author knowing it (in which case, you should just give up; they are too good).

Can you imagine carrying around your receipts of purchase & other documentation, in the time of the Ostraca.
3 from of ID in your wallet, would weigh you down considerably.

If the US elite is not ready to grant its own people true free elections, why would they allow it in Arab countries? Yes, the methods used to sabotage elections in Arab countries are more crued and dangerous (like arming one side against the other), but the desired outcome is the same: Serve Empire and shut-up (This holds true also for working classes in the US, btw. They're servants not profiteers of Empire. That's why many of them don't turn out to vote anymore.)

But the question is, where does this readiness come from to destroy our countries and fight civil wars? For what have all the ~200.000 people had to die in Algeria of the 1990's? What is Hamas-Fatah-divide for? The situation in Egypt? And the refugees fleeing Tunisia in the past few years?
Is it just because we are naive to believe Western rhetoric? What is cancelling elections going to change? Elections are not the solution, but also not the problem. The problem is somewhere deeper, and I think, we should look deeply and (self)critically into these questions.

'where does the readiness come from"
Is exactly the right question & it is the populations of the Middle East that need to demand answer to this exact query.

Interesting article I can relate and agree to.a question to the author-how and by what means should the"west" or more urgently, should the Arab world react to the plight of victimized citizens in places such as Sudan and Iraq ? Is sitting idol an option?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

^ Back to Top