Iran nuclear talks enter third day

Al-Akhbar is currently going through a transitional phase whereby the English website is available for Archival purposes only. All new content will be published in Arabic on the main website (

Al-Akhbar Management

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, center, attends talks flanked by members of his delegation during talks over Iran's nuclear program in Geneva on November 22, 2013.(Photo: AFP - Fabrice Coffrini)

Published Friday, November 22, 2013

Iran and world powers haggled Friday over a breakthrough nuclear accord on the third day of talks in Geneva, with Tehran complaining of "no progress."

This third and crucial meeting since President Hassan Rohani was elected in June is seen as the biggest hope in years to resolve the decade-old standoff over Iran's nuclear program.

Clinching a deal palatable to sceptical hardliners both in the United States and in the Islamic republic – as well as Israel – has proven a daunting task, however.

Failure might mean Iran resuming the expansion of its atomic activities, Washington and others adding to already painful sanctions, and possible Israeli military action.

According to a draft proposal hammered out on November 9, the United States, Britain, China, France, Russia, and Germany – the P5+1 – want Iran to freeze for six months key parts of its nuclear program.

In return Iran would get minor and, Western officials insist, "reversible" sanctions relief, including unlocking several billion dollars in oil revenues stuck in international bank accounts.

This hoped-for "first phase" deal would build trust and ease tensions while Iran and the six powers hammer out a final accord.

Western powers claim that Iran is building up its nuclear capacity in order to build a bomb, something the Islamic republic strongly denies.

"A first step is a very, very important deal because it means that a deal has been struck, which changes the atmosphere, changes the conversation," said Trita Parsi, author and president of the National Iranian American Council.

Friday's third day of talks, which resumed in the morning with a meeting between the powers' chief negotiator Catherine Ashton and Iran's foreign minister, "could be decisive," a European source said.

It was unclear how long they would last, possibly extending into the weekend, or whether rumors were true that foreign ministers would fly in as they did at the last round two weeks ago.

This has not been confirmed and indeed Iran's chief negotiator Abbas Araqchi said on Thursday that there had been "no progress" so far, and no deal in sight yet.

But the P5+1 have been somewhat more upbeat.

Ashton's spokesman said that her four and half hours of talks on Thursday with Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif were "very good."

"It has been very intense, very substantial, very detailed," Michael Mann said, saying such a landmark deal is "not something you can just agree like that."

"We are making progress. There are fewer points in brackets" in the draft agreement, the European source said.

"But obviously the remaining issues are the hardest ones."

Many in Israel, widely assumed to have a formidable nuclear arsenal itself, are strongly opposed to Iranian uranium enrichment.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is campaigning vigorously against the mooted deal, demanding that all of Iran's nuclear infrastructure be dismantled, not parts of it frozen, believing that the P5+1 will leave Iran with an ability to develop nuclear weapons.

"You are not really dismantling any capacity to make fissile material for nuclear weapons," he said in an interview in Germany's Bild, Europe's top-selling newspaper, this week.

In the United States meanwhile there is a push by lawmakers to ignore President Barack Obama's pleas and pass yet more sanctions on Iran if there is no deal – or one seen as too soft.

Raising the pressure, US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said in Washington on Thursday that lawmakers would move to impose new trade restrictions in December.

This risks spoiling Iran's apparent newfound appetite for rapprochement with the West since Rohani replaced the more hardline Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in August.

Rohani is under pressure to show the supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei the first fruits of his "charm offensive," and it is unclear whether the minor sanctions relief on offer is enough.

Khamenei, describing Israel as a doomed "rabid dog," said in Iran on Wednesday on the first day of the talks that he insisted "on not retreating one step from the rights of the Iranian nation."

By this he meant what he sees as the "right" to enrich uranium, something the P5+1 are loath to endorse explicitly and which is a key sticking point in Geneva.

"The principle of enrichment is not something that is negotiable," Araqchi said Wednesday.
"But we can talk about volumes, the level and the location."

(AFP, Al-Akhbar)


What? No talk of French obstruction? France, namely Hollande and Fabius have been warned that any more trickery will be rewarded with punishment. The powers that be, the banksters and China want this deal.

The economic and financial system of the West is declining markedly and all the imaginary statistics they produce about their GDP won't cover up that fact. They can ill afford any major obstacles.

Should the talks fall apart the only option is military which would likely cause a regional of not world war. The price of oil would immediately jump to $150 a barrel or more sending the world economy into the abyss.

This would cause a larger financial crisis than 2008. The major banks in the West are fudging their books and would crash taking the world with them and most likely the dollar as well.

Should Hollande's folly foil the talks He, Fabius and France would be the target of merciless punishment. No Saudi or Israeli help would give them cover. Hollande and Fabius would usher in the return of the guillotine ...

Hollande and Fabius are on the wrong side of history and the wrong side of the powers that be including the banksters.

Should Fabius and Hollande once again sabotage the talks their careers will be reduced to smoking piles of ash ...

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

^ Back to Top