Israeli Media Assess Hezbollah’s Arms

Al-Akhbar is currently going through a transitional phase whereby the English website is available for Archival purposes only. All new content will be published in Arabic on the main website (

Al-Akhbar Management

A woman from the Bulgarian Jewish community attends a commemoration ceremony at Sofia's synagogue on 10 March 2013. (Photo: AFP - Dimitar Dilkoff)

By: Yahya Dbouk

Published Friday, April 5, 2013

Recent Israeli reports have placed remarkable – and repeated – emphasis on Hezbollah’s military capabilities and its unprecedented potential for inflicting harm on Israel in the event of war. The reports mark a departure from Tel Aviv’s approach to the issue throughout 2012.

Large-scale devastation and a high number of casualties on the Israeli side, the reports reckoned, should be expected in any war with Lebanon, both in occupied Palestine and along the frontlines. The conflict would not spare Israeli infrastructure, including communications, transport, and power plants.

Israel would also have to cope with a practical naval blockade, while offshore oil and gas facilities may come under fire, as they are considered relatively easy targets.

The latest warning in this direction was issued by the head of the Israeli Technological and Logistics Directorate ‘Atal’, Brig. Gen. Kobi Barak. Barak said that Hezbollah had the military capacity to “shake the ground” beneath Israel, on account of its arsenal of powerful and precise rockets.

Previous reports emphasized something else entirely, and claimed that the Israeli army had completed its preparations for a conflict on the northern front. The Israeli army was now even more prepared than 2006 for war with Lebanon, those reports alleged, while steering clear as much as possible from discussing Hezbollah’s capabilities.

In the Israeli view, the Lebanese and Syrian fronts are highly flammable, and one stroke of a matchstick is enough to ignite them. A high-ranking military source recently told Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth that those who are privy to classified information realize that the current lull is but a “time-out” before war breaks out with Lebanon and Syria.

At the same time, several internal developments in Israel itself have contributed to the warnings over Hezbollah. For instance, the newly formed government led by Benjamin Netanyahu intends to scale back the defense budget for this year and the next. The Israeli army fears its readiness and training programs for future conflicts could be affected.

The threat of war and defense budget cuts also explain the recent shift in the Israeli approach, from glorifying the Israeli army, to emphasizing the strength of the opponent, namely, Hezbollah.

But simultaneously, this exposes the real estimates – and concerns – of the security establishment in Israel as regards the coming war, and also Israel’s powerlessness to prevent its damages.

In its latest assessment of a future conflict, Israel concluded that 1,200 rockets, of various types would hit Israel on each day of fighting. Furthermore, 5,000 warheads are currently pointed towards Tel Aviv, each carrying an explosive payload of between 300 and 880 kg.

Cities and population centers in Israel have no real protection from the rockets of the Resistance. The Iron Dome missile shield system would be mainly used to protect the army’s combat operations, meaning the batteries would be deployed around military airports – and even then it is doubtful they can offer much protection.

Ultimately, Israel’s implicit recognition of the prohibitive costs of any coming war with Hezbollah lends credence to the following equation: While the threat Hezbollah poses is a strong motivation for Israel to wage war, it is also sufficient to deter it from starting the conflict.

This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.


Israeli media is obsessed with these missiles due to the mostly psychological damage done when Hiz and then Hamas fired thousands of rockets. Iron Dome is certainly better than cowering in fear (as suggested by ex IDF expert in previous article), but I think that the Israelis are leaning more heavily on pre-emptive strikes for the next (G-d forbid) conflict. I think historians will point out that the 6 Day War was a lot more successful than the defensive wars fought ever since.

"The Iron Dome missile shield system would be mainly used to protect the army’s combat operations, meaning the batteries would be deployed around military airports – and even then it is doubtful they can offer much protection.”

Having spent summers in Ashkelon prior to the Iron Dome, I saw various buildings hit & the destruction of the rockets was evident (e.g., the Mall on the east end of town & the neighborhood near the hospital). The amount of destruction to city buildings markedly decreased despite periods of intense barrages after the Iron Dome. I have heard (and seen) the explosions as the dome shoots down these rockets. So I’ve found these claims of the ineffectiveness of the Iron Dome inaccurate & likely motivated by a suspicion of all things reported in the Israeli news. Also, check the amount of destruction to building infrastructure in Beer Sheba before & after the installation of the Dome. I suspect (though I am less familiar with the area) a similar pattern will be clear. Accuracy is key in assessing what motivates a people & nation.

In the end, may peace be found. May we learn to seek the mutual joy of one another. May we see one another even as we see the intense suffering of our own. Blessings upon your publication. I stumbled across this lovely production & I was grateful to find a news source (in English) that cared about the whole of Arab life, rather than just the conflict. You have enriched my understanding of the Arab world & changed me. Thank you.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

^ Back to Top