Syria peace talks not making much progress, says envoy

Al-Akhbar is currently going through a transitional phase whereby the English website is available for Archival purposes only. All new content will be published in Arabic on the main website (

Al-Akhbar Management

UN-Arab League envoy for Syria Lakhdar Brahimi speaks during a press conference on the Syrian peace talks at the United Nations headquarters on February 11, 2014 in Geneva. (Photo: AFP - Philippe Desmazes)

Published Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Updated 5:00 pm: Peace talks between the Syrian government and opposition are not making much progress, international mediator Lakhdar Brahimi said on Tuesday after a face-to-face meeting of the warring parties in Geneva.

As negotiations intended to end Syria's three-year-old war concluded the second day of this week's session, both sides had no advances to report.

Brahimi, a veteran diplomat charged with running the internationally sponsored talks, said he planned to report to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the Security Council within the next few weeks.

"The beginning of this week is as laborious as it was in the first week. We are not making much progress," he told a news conference at United Nations headquarters.

Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mikdad said Tuesday was a "lost day" while opposition spokesman Louay Safi said "no progress" had been made.

In an attempt to address the main questions confronting the rival delegations, Brahimi had proposed that they discuss ending the violence on Tuesday and the formation of a transitional governing body on Wednesday, delegates say.

But the two issues have caused deep rifts and delayed negotiations, which started last month with little result and resumed this week.

A main issue is the role of President Bashar al-Assad in a transitional governing body. The government says it will not discuss his leaving power while the opposition wants him out.

Mikdad said no agenda had been agreed for the talks, blaming the opposition's refusal to discuss the issue of "terrorism" which he says much be covered first. He said the government considers almost all those fighting it in Syria as "terrorists".

"Today was another lost day because the representatives of the (opposition) Coalition insisted that there is no terrorism in Syria," he said.

National Coalition spokesman Safi said: "It is obvious the regime is stalling and still believes in a military solution."

Specifically, he said the opposition and the government disagreed over the issues of violence and political transition, with the opposition seeing the creation of a transitional governing body as vital to the stability of the country.

Anas Abdah, a strategist in the opposition team, said "the regime is consistently trying to get rid of the transitional governing body. Today it basically refused to discuss it."

A statement from the Coalition said today's session was very tense and accused the government of attempting to "stall the talks".

There had been hopes for Tuesday's talks after they began with a minute of silence for the 100,000 people killed in Syria since the conflict began.

So far, the only tangible result of the talks process has been an agreement to allow aid into the Old City of Homs, where rebels have been under siege for more than year, and to allow people to leave.

Meanwhile, earlier in the day, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that a draft of a new United Nations humanitarian resolution on Syria was "absolutely one-sided "as talks between Syria's government and opposition resumed.

"The ideas that were shared with us by those initiating this process... are absolutely unacceptable and contain an ultimatum for the government, that if they don't solve all this in two weeks then we automatically introduce sanctions," the Russian foreign minister said in Moscow.

"Instead of engaging in everyday, meticulous work to resolve problems that block deliveries of humanitarian aid, they see a new resolution as some kind of simplistic solution," he said.

UN diplomats have tried to persuade Russia to back a new resolution, drafted by Australia, Jordan and Luxembourg, which "demands that all parties, in particular the Syrian authorities, immediately end the sieges of the Old City of Homs."

But Lavrov said focusing on one city and the government's role was "absolutely one-sided and detached from the facts."

"It's as if there are no witness accounts, even from the humanitarian agencies, that the militant groups are the main impediments to the humanitarian operation in Homs and in delivering humanitarian aid to the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp," he said.

He added that other Syrian cities like Zahra and Al Hasakah also need to be unblocked, and that the UN needed to focus more on the spread of terrorism in the war-torn country.

"It's time for the Security Council to pay attention to an equally frightening aspect of the Syrian crisis, and that is the growth of terrorism due to the conflict."

"It's time not just to react to the singular manifestations of terrorism," he said. "It's time to... speak out in principle about the terrorist threat, to approach this problem systematically."

(Reuters, AFP, Al-Akhbar)


The burden should be upon the Opposition to prove they represent the many factions of Islamic jihadi on the ground. Let them collect the signatures of all the leaders of the factions to the effect that these fighters will stand down if the Opposition reaches an agreement with the government. Otherwise, we must assume the Opposition is effete and impotent, and has no real power even over their own rebel opposition. Probably should be negotiating with Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia, who claimed to Putin that he controlled all the terrorists in the world. I think a parliamentarian form of government modeled upon the English system, might be best, so Assad could remain as either head of a coalition government, or as head of the loyal opposition. No one else has been tested and tried to be able to run the government, not an easy task in the Mideast, which has known strong man nation states, and they have proven to be better than some more recent attempts at liberal republic democracies. The transition from monarchy to republican form of government was not accomplished in one movement in the West circa 18th century as well, and some democracies as in US have been so corrupted by the Black Market corporatist State that it has become a tyranny of democracy, so called.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

^ Back to Top