Nasrallah: If takfiris succeed in Syria, all in Lebanon will be eliminated

Al-Akhbar is currently going through a transitional phase whereby the English website is available for Archival purposes only. All new content will be published in Arabic on the main website (

Al-Akhbar Management

An image grab from al-Manar TV shows Hassan Nasrallah, the head of Hezbollah, giving a televised address from an undisclosed location on March 29, 2014 in Lebanon. (Photo: AFP / al-Manar)

By: Chloé Benoist

Published Saturday, March 29, 2014

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah warned of the threat posed to Lebanon by Islamist fighters in the Syrian conflict on Saturday.

In a televised speech, Nasrallah discussed Hezbollah’s involvement in Syria, as well as the criticisms leveled against the resistance movement within Lebanon.

“If takfiris achieve victory in Syria, we would all be eliminated in Lebanon, not just the resistance,” he said, as his speech was broadcast to an audience commemorating the opening of a cultural center in south Lebanon.

Nasrallah said that Hezbollah had advocated for a political solution to the Syrian conflict from the beginning, a position which he said countries backing the Syrian opposition were just beginning to support.

“From the beginning we said we wanted a political solution, whereas the Arab League wanted to topple Assad,” he said. “Did it need three years of destruction for the Arab League to make a decision it should have done from the beginning?”

“Now after three years of armament, incitement and sabotage, they are putting together terrorist lists and putting the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) and other takfiri groups on them.”

The Syrian conflict, which recently entered its third year, has killed more than 100,000 and displaced millions of Syrians, both internally and in neighboring countries. The United Nations stopped updating its estimated death toll in July, saying it no longer had sufficient reliable sources.

“What is happening in Syria is no longer about reform and democracy,” Nasrallah said. “The armed takfiris are now fighting each other, and thousands of victims have paid the price.”

Speaking of Hezbollah’s military involvement alongside Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Nasrallah said that “this axis is not looking for revenge, it is looking for peace.”

Hezbollah, he said, intervened in the conflict for the first time in Ghouta, in order to protect the shrine of Zeinab, prophet Muhammad’s granddaughter.

Nasrallah compared Hezbollah’s protection of Zeinab’s shrine with Turkey, which recently threatened to intervene in Syria should anything happen to the shrine of an ancestor of the founder of the Ottoman empire.

“Turkey says that it has the right to protect a shrine in Syria from ISIS fighters,” he said. “Why is Turkey allowed to do this and not us?”

“Our stance in Syria is political, not military. We intervened late,” he added.

Nasrallah rebuffed critiques within Lebanon of its involvement in Syria, calling for a change in positions.

“I'm not going to tell you (Lebanese opponents) to come fight with us in Syria, but to re-evaluate your stance,” he said.

Nasrallah added that certain political groups, which he did not name, had offered to join Hezbollah in Syria, but that Hezbollah had turned them down, saying there was “no need” for additional fighters.

The Hezbollah leader reiterated the group’s commitment to fighting alongside the Syrian government.

“We didn't bow down to this (opposition) campaign because it poses a strategic existential threat to Syria, Lebanon and Palestine,” he said.

Nasrallah dismissed statements by March 14 politicians attacking the role of the resistance in Lebanon.

“The three-way equation established Lebanon as an important player in the region,” he said, referring to the army, the people and the Resistance. “You who speak about the failure of the three-way equation, but tell me how you succeeded in protecting Lebanon?”

Nasrallah chalked up opposition to Hezbollah as a long-standing hostility towards the resistance in Lebanon.

“Some have a problem with the Resistance because its fighters are Shia, but did you use to support them when they were secular fighters?” he asked, noting that the Lebanese resistance against Israel began in 1948 and was then mainly composed of nationalist secular parties.

“Ever since the foundation of the Zionist entity, there has been a debate on the resistance.”

“This resistance will remain solid, with its head hung high, protecting its people and its nation,” he added.

However, Nasrallah added that animosity against Hezbollah since the formation of a new cabinet could affect its decision to participate in Lebanese political dialogue.

“Regarding the national dialogue, I don't want to declare a stance, but this way of thinking will impact Hezbollah's decision to participate in the national dialogue,” he said. “But Hezbollah's decision won't affect its allies' decision to participate.”


Nasrallah is correct is his suspicion of a "national dialog" especially when Suleiman would be at the helm. The presidential elections should come first. Then, only then, should there be a national dialog.

The national dialog would be an opportunity for more discord, leading to an unraveling of the current fragile government. Suleiman is desperate to be heard but has nothing to say of any use or importance.

Unfortunately the other parties are stepping into this trap as politicians are always thrilled at the sound of their own voices. This early national dialog can only serve to derail the progress of the new government.

Yeah. All are takfiris. like the Zionist argue that all Palestinians are Muslim Terrorists.

It is interesting that Nasrallah would use the same weak justification for entry into Syria as Erdogan or Davutoglu used several days before to justify their actions in and around Kesab. This seems like a rare mistake on his part.

Or it could be a sign that a major shift is underway.

I am curious as to the identity of the unamed political groups who asked to fight alongside Hezbollah. Were they Lebanese or maybe the PFLP?

Given his past behaviour, Erdogan will either be stronger or more belligerent (if the AKP does badly) after Sunday's municipal elections. Could it be that he is throwing unwanted takfiris at Kesab in an effort to grind them down just before he and the Qataris turn toward Russia and Iran?

The region is standing at the edge of complete havoc. Discord, mayhem och despair is governing our countries. Satan has unleashed his relentless forces. They will efface us unless we do not unite under one banner, the banner of brotherhood and Islam. It is currently shining, with a fervent glow, in the hands of Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah and Imam Khamenei. In these arduous times Allah will bring peace where there is chaos, mercy where there is cruelty and unity where there is strife.

May Allah shower His mercy on you, O Nasrallah, for your eloquent speeches, shining advices and diligent, fearless labours.

Wa salam

The takfiri scum would have already taken over had it not been for the bravery and sacrifices of our resistance. I shudder to think what would have happened had it not been for the presence of Hizbollah and their intervention in Syria. We should all be grateful to them and our martyrs. LONG LIVE SAYYED HASSAN. LONG LIVE THE RESISTANCE!!!

He took a break from occupation and killing Muslims to go on TV. What a hero!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><h1><h2><h3><h4><h5><h6><blockquote><span><aside>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

^ Back to Top